SR&ED and IRAP: Canada Research and Development Funding | TSGI
home | about us | success stories | sitemap | links | contact us
SR&ED and IRAP: Canada Research and Development Funding | TSGI
                     what is SR&ED? | what is IRAP? | SR&ED and IRAP alternatives | potential R&D applications | how SR&ED works | how IRAP works | when to apply
   
SR&ED and IRAP ALTERNATIVES - Raising Capital Privately
self-funding
angel funding
venture capital funding
foundation grants &
award programs
p
government grants
raising capital publicly
raising capital privately
   


Why Private Investor Funding?

Raising capital privately is a common source of early-stage research and development funding. The reasons are similar to those that motivate self-funding. Private investor funding allows remuneration of employees at market rates but at the cost of relinquishing a degree of ownership and control over the company and decision-making. Private investor funding is an umbrella term for types of funding that do not involve securities listed on a public stock exchange, and so includes selling private company shares in a number of situations: the three F’s (family, friends, and fools), other private offerings in defined increments at defined terms in one or more tranches, angel investors, and venture capitalists.

Raising Capital Privately While Retaining Control
Share ownership issues can be especially troublesome for start-ups and early-stage companies because share values are extremely difficult to determine: they are often completely dependent on the future development that the financing is being raised for! The potential private investor funding provider needs to be concerned about future funding sources over the course of the development in addition to the technical and “normal” business risks, and may demand a high risk premium (i.e. a large percentage of the total shares) for his investment. Often warrants for optional future share purchases can be worked into the equation to help defray some of that premium. The timing and the pricing of the warrants has to balance investor expectations with the anticipated progress of development.

The matter of control may be a significant issue as well. Depending on how the overall share ownership has been structured as part of the private investor funding process, if key developer(s) / shareholders manage to retain a controlling interest alone or in a like-minded block, control over the future course of development may not be problematic. The longer the course of development, the larger the total development cost / capital flow, and the greater the number of unforeseen roadblocks encountered, the more difficult to retain control.

Private Investor Funding is Preferred for SRED Implications
From an SR&ED viewpoint, raising capital privately (other considerations aside) is preferred to the “going public” route because (if ownership is primarily Canadian) it is more likely to keep your company in the category of CCPC or “refundable” (versus “non-refundable”) claimant. This means a fundamental difference in the SR&ED tax credit structure: 35% of project SR&ED costs are paid to you in cash as compared to 20% of SRED costs offset against income taxes otherwise owing. As a start-up or early-stage company with little or no current taxes, the non-refundable SR&ED tax credit is of little current value and unknown future value. TSGI can assist you with these and other considerations.

Tax-free capital gains rollovers for small business investors—investors can defer the taxation of capital gains on small business shares, up to certain limits, if they reinvest the proceeds of disposition in other small businesses. An overall lifetime $500k ($750k after March 19 2007) exemption applies. This can be a fruitful strategy for serial entrepreneurs / inventors.

 
  Contact Us in Calgary, Alberta, Canada